Maharishi Arvind University Reviews on Placements, Faculty & Facilities
Maharishi Arvind University (MAU), Udaipur - Reviews on Placements, Faculty & Facilities
1. Placements
Mixed Feedback: Placement records vary by department. Engineering (especially Computer Science) and Management streams report better placement opportunities compared to arts and science disciplines.
Average Packages: For technical courses, placements range between ?2.5 - 4 LPA, with some students securing higher packages (up to ?6-7 LPA) in IT/CS fields.
Recruiters: Companies like TCS, Wipro, Infosys, Byju’s, and local firms visit the campus, but opportunities may be limited for non-technical courses.
Internships: Some students mention decent internship support, particularly in professional courses.
Placement Cell: The university has a placement cell, but students suggest it needs more industry tie-ups for better opportunities.
2. Faculty
Experienced & Supportive: Many reviewers highlight that faculty in professional courses (Engineering, Pharmacy, Management) are well-qualified and helpful.
Mixed Opinions: Some students in arts/science departments feel teaching quality varies, with a few reporting outdated methods.
Research & Industry Exposure: Limited research opportunities, but faculty in technical fields guide students on projects and certifications.
3. Facilities
Campus & Infrastructure:
The campus is spacious and green, with decent academic blocks and hostels.
Labs & Libraries: Well-equipped labs for engineering and science programs; the central library has a good collection of books and e-resources.
Hostels: Separate hostels for boys and girls with basic amenities, though some students mention maintenance issues.
Sports & Extracurriculars: Adequate sports facilities, but cultural events could be more frequent.
4. Overall Verdict
Pros: Affordable fees, decent infrastructure, good faculty in professional courses.
Cons: Placements inconsistent (especially for non-technical fields), limited industry exposure, and some administrative delays.
Final Rating: 3.5/5 (Better for Engineering & Management; other departments need improvement).
